Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Prudential Ins Co of Amer v. E.M.M. et al
as 3:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Prudential Ins Co of Amer
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, E. M. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Dixon v. Piper et al
as 3:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Aurelius Piper, State of CT, Amy Marella and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Magner Mgmt LLC et al v. Danbury Cemetery Assoc et al
as 3:2009cv01883
Plaintiff:
Magner Mgmt LLC, William E. Magner, JR. and Union Memorial Mgmt LLC
Defendant:
Danbury Cemetery Assoc, Warren Levy and Jehad Sabbagh
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Zanette v. Pecunies et al
as 3:2009cv01845
Plaintiff:
Delmo L. Zanette
Defendant:
Ronald E. Pecunies, Arthor K. Watson, Jr., Joe Cotraneo and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Barmazai v. Rite Aide Corp. et al
as 3:2009cv01076
Plaintiff:
Philippa Barmazai
Defendant:
Barbara Kazaluskas, Mirgena Backa, Benjola Shule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barmazai v. Rite Aid Corp. et al
as 3:2009mc00220
Plaintiff:
Philippa Barmazai
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corp., Barbara Kazaluskas, Mirgena Backa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quatroche v. Salem Bd of Ed
as 3:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
John E. Quatroche, II
Defendant:
Salem Bd of Ed
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Quatroche v. Salem Bd of Ed
as 3:2009mc00155
Plaintiff:
John E. Quatroche, II
Defendant:
Salem Bd of Ed
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hale v. Great Oak Capital LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00514
Plaintiff:
Perry Hale
Defendant:
Great Oak Capital LLC and Bradley E. Sinrod
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hanninen v. Fedoravitch et al
as 3:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Hanninen
Defendant:
Linn Fedoravitch, Financial Sys Mgmt, Camp Out and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
