Cases 11 - 19 of 19
GRUBY et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
as 2:2014cv05912
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GRUBY , SUSAN NEUHAUS , ADAM RITTENHOUSE and others
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS HABERDASHERS, INC. v. PARTNERSHIP LLC
as 2:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
ADAMS HABERDASHERS, INC.
Defendant:
PARTNERSHIP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP v. EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
Defendant:
EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT LLC, THE POST-EFFECTIVE DATE CREDITORS COMMITTEE AS AGENT FOR THE PI SETTLING PLAINTIFFS, ERA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
ADAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY, ET AL
as 3:2009cv06030
Movant:
MABLE ADAMS
Respondent:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
JACKSON v. KATZ et al
as 2:2008cv04734
Plaintiff:
TRENISE JACKSON
Defendant:
ADAM JEFFREY KATZ, LAW OFFICE OF ADAM JEFFREY KATZ, ADAM JEFFREY KATZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2008cv03528
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Defendant:
EMMA ADAMS, MELANIE ADAMS and JAMES ADAMS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURPHY et al v. RIVERWALK COMMONS RED BANK L.L.C. et al
as 3:2008cv01668
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY and MARIA ROSE DOWE
Defendant:
RIVERWALK COMMONS RED BANK L.L.C., RIVERWALK DEVELOPERS, INC., 325 ADAMS STREET, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS v. C.R. BARD
as 3:2008cv01068
Respondent:
GERARD ADAMS and C.R. BARD
Petitioner:
ZS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
RIVER STREET IDEALEASE, LLC v. A. ADAMS TRUCKING & AIR FREIGHT (CORP.)(CO.)(INC.)
as 2:2007cv01703
Plaintiff:
RIVER STREET IDEALEASE, LLC
Defendant:
A. ADAMS TRUCKING & AIR FREIGHT (CORP.)(CO.)(INC.)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
