Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Kendall
as 2:2017cv06922
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ALLEN v. EQUIFAX MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03699
Plaintiff:
HENRY ALLEN
Defendant:
EQUIFAX MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GUNNISON v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03497
Plaintiff:
DORIS GUNNISON
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHANSKY v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04013
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JOHANSKY
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC , TRANSUNION, LLC and DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RANDALL v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2011cv04830
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE RANDALL
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LOPATKA v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.
as 1:2011cv02472
Plaintiff:
MALGORZATA ANNA LOPATKA
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WIDOM v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01170
Plaintiff:
STACEY WIDOM
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. and DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
STAPLETON v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2010cv02970
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. STAPLETON
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
YEAGER v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2010cv02389
Plaintiff:
E. TROY YEAGER
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
NOLLER v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
as 1:2010cv02092
Plaintiff:
RYCE NOLLER
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
