Cases 11 - 20 of 29
LG Textile v. Premiere Fabrics et al
as 2:2014cv05157
Defendant:
Does and Premier Fabrics Inc
Plaintiff:
LG Textile
Smith v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv04361
Plaintiff:
Laury Smith
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and Sears Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
Wi-LAN, Inc.
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Ericsson Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Ex-Parte Application of, LG Electronics Deutschland and LG Electronics Japan, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01197
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics Deutschland GMBH and LG Electronics Japan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grisham et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv01400
Plaintiff:
Shawn Grisham and Bobby Cline
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, LG Electroncis U.S.A., Inc, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grisham et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01400
Plaintiff:
Shawn Grisham and Bobby Cline
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, LG Electroncis U.S.A., Inc, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hiles v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06641
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hiles
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, LG Electronics, Inc and LG Electronics USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frank Figueroa v. LG Sciences LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00611
Defendant:
Does and LG Sciences LLC
Plaintiff:
Frank Figueroa
Frank Figueroa v. LG Sciences LLC et al
as 5:2011cv02013
Defendant:
Does and LG Sciences LLC
Plaintiff:
Frank Figueroa
Fischer et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06199
Plaintiff:
Colleen Fischer , Kurt Fairfield , David Sarafian and others
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc , LG Electroncis, Inc., HTC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
