Cases 21 - 30 of 106
KALIDINDI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv01344
Plaintiff:
GOUTHAM VARMA KALIDINDI and DIVYA DANTULURI
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LORETTA E LYNCH, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BHAGAT et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
SANGEETA BHAGAT and PRIYAM BHAGAT
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA LYNCH , LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PENAGALURI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
NAGALATHA PENAGALURI and SATISH KUMAR BASETTY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LORETTA LYNCH, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
JAISWAL v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
VIVEK JAISWAL
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA LYNCH , JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SANKARANARAYANAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00809
Plaintiff:
SHALINI SANKARANARAYANAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA LYNCH , JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00448
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN LI and PENG GAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
APARANJI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
SHRIRAMAN APARANJI and APARNA DESHPANDE
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MISHRA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAPNA MISHRA and ROHITH SHIVASWAMY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZUNDEL v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
INGRID ZUNDEL
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ, DONALD NEUFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
