Cases 21 - 30 of 14,108
SISCO v. Leaf Home Enhancements, LLC.,
as 1:2024cv04408
Plaintiff:
LAURA SISCO
Defendant:
Leaf Home Enhancements, LLC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. the United States Mail package bearing tracking number 9534 6159 0109 4142 8417 14, further described in Attachment A
as 1:2024mc00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
the United States Mail package bearing tracking number 9534 6159 0109 4142 8417 14, further described in Attachment A
Droppleman et al v. Droppleman
as 1:2024cv04362
Plaintiff:
Patrick Droppleman and John Michael Droppleman
Defendant:
Denise Droppleman
DWM International, Inc v. Cristaux, Inc
as 1:2024cv02758
Plaintiff:
DWM International, Inc and DWM International, Inc doing business as Society Awards, Inc.
Defendant:
Cristaux, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. In the Matter of the Search of: A cellular telephone,
as 1:2024mc00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In the Matter of the Search of: A cellular telephone,
Board of Trustees of Unite Here Health v. Unite Here Local 11
as 1:2024cv04304
Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
Petitioner:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Durden v. Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04298
Plaintiff:
Comyia Durden
Defendant:
Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Khan v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Shiraz Khan
Defendant:
Kevin J. Riddle and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BP Products North America, Inc. v. Vega Capital London Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv04226
Respondent:
Vega Capital London Ltd. and Adrian Spires
Petitioner:
BP Products North America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
