Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Buckingham, Kimberly v. Colony Brands Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Buckingham
Defendant:
Colony Brands Inc. and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Cunningham, Craig v. Montes, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00761
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Michael Montes, Tollfreezone.com, Inc., Mydataguys.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Heisler v. Convergent Healthcare Recoveries Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01344
Plaintiff:
Chad H Heisler
Defendant:
Convergent Healthcare Recoveries Inc and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Masci v. CDI Northwest LLC
as 2:2016cv01091
Plaintiff:
Vance Masci
Defendant:
CDI Northwest LLC , CDI Management Corp , Milwaukee Center for Diagnostic Imaging LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilder Chiropractic, Inc. v. Save On, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Wilder Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Save On, LLC and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Dairyland Animal Clinic, S.C. v. Homeopet, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Dairyland Animal Clinic, S.C.
Defendant:
Homeopet, L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Tolman v RGS Financial Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Shane Tolman
Defendant:
RGS Financial Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hohl v. USAA Savings Bank et al
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
August Hohl
Defendant:
USAA Savings Bank and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brouillette v. Jeana Fleitz LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
David L Brouillette, DC SC
Defendant:
Jeana Fleitz LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Brouillette v. Sigma Instruments Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
David L Brouillette, DC SC
Defendant:
Sigma Instruments Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
