Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Murphy v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 3:2009cv02942
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Murphy et al
as 4:2009cv05977
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Smith
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Volkswagon Credit Inc. and Volkswagon Credit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Murphy v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. Capital Management Services, LP
as 3:2009cv02648
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. Viking Collection Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02150
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Viking Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. ER Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
ER Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KLA-Tencor Corporation v. Murphy et al
as 5:2009cv01922
Plaintiff:
KLA-Tencor Corporation and KLA-Tencor Corporation
Defendant:
Brian Murphy, Renwick Thompson, Peter Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2009cv00750
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Kenneth Robert Murphy-Peterson
as 2:2009cv02531
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenneth Robert Murphy-Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
USA v. Murphy-Denmark
as 2:2008mc00142
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Belinda A. Murphy-Denmark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
