Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Meyer v. Merrill Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv10165
Petitioner:
Anthony Meyer
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch and Finra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The City of Lake Forest v. Lee
as 1:2015cv06338
Plaintiff:
The City of Lake Forest
Defendant:
Stephen Anthony Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv04766
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey , Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peebles v. Chicago State University et al
as 1:2015cv02547
Defendant:
Chicago State University , Board of Trustees of Chicago State University , Wayne Watson and others
Plaintiff:
LaShondra Peebles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pavone et al v. The Law Offices of Anthony Mancini, Ltd.
as 1:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pavone , Karen Pavone and M. P.
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Anthony Mancini, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elion, Sr. et al v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01508
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Elion, Sr. and Jeanette Elion
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ivone v. iTime Marketing, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04668
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Ivone
Defendant:
iTime Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. The Auto Link, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01212
Defendant:
The Auto Link, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
Vacco v. Passages Hospice, LLC
as 1:2014cv02104
Defendant:
Passages Hospice, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vacco
Cause Of Action: Worker Adjustment and Restraining Notification Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
