Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Nissou-Rabban v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv01675
Plaintiff:
Sandy Nissou-Rabban
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nissou-Rabban v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv01673
Plaintiff:
Sandy Nissou-Rabban
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Nordstrom, Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jason L. Williams v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 8:2015cv00874
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Nelson & Kennard
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Williams
Oberg v. Capital One Bank, USA N.A, et al
as 2:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
Danial Oberg
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, USA N.A , CACH LLC and Neuheisel Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nash v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 4:2014cv02013
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Warren Todd Nash
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Toumi v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 4:2013cv04842
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Toumi
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bigelow v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 3:2013cv02457
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bigelow
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Petersen v. Hunt and Henriques et al
as 1:2013cv01066
Defendant:
Hunt and Henriques, Donald Sherrill and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
Dione Petersen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Drost v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drost
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. and Law Offices of Harris & Zide
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Staley v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 3:2012cv03017
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Staley
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
