Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in California
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
United States of America v. James D. Owens
as 2:2009mc00211
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James D. Owens
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
David Owens v. Gateway Mental Health Center et al
as 2:2008cv02307
Plaintiff: David Owens
Defendant: Gateway Mental Health Center and Cal State Univ Long Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Sen, et al v. Heinauer, et al
as 3:2007cv04588
Plaintiff: Sumit Sen and Maria Cristina Duran
Defendant: Gerard Heinauer, Emilio Gonzalez, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wiggins v. Asbestos Defendants (B P) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv01322
Defendant: Asbestos Defendants (B P), The Boeing Company, Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Charlie Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burton et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2007cv00712
Plaintiff: Geraldine Burton, Geraldine Burton, Geraldine Burton and others
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Armstrong International Inc., Buffalo Pumps Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Khan et al v. Rice et al
as 3:2007cv00613
Petitioner: Ishrat Khan and Nasir Khan
Respondent: Condoleeza Rice, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cintas Corporation v. Arvizu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv05083
Petitioner: Cintas Corporation
Respondent: Ronald Arvizu , Sean Bachman , Gary Badgerow and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cintas Corporation v. Christensen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv05086
Petitioner: Cintas Corporation
Respondent: Eugene Christensen , Steven M. Coe , Pasquale D'Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?