Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Wilder Chiropractic, Inc. v. Push Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Wilder Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Push Health, Inc., Accesa Health, LLC, Accesa Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Andersen v. Riverwalk Holdings LTD
as 2:2015cv00621
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings LTD and John Does
Plaintiff:
Dean Andersen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Uline Inc v. Doe
as 2:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
Uline Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Thompson v. Upstate Debt Management Inc
as 1:2012cv00151
Defendant:
Upstate Debt Management Inc, James Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kennett v. Debt Recovery Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01023
Defendant:
Debt Recovery Solutions LLC, John Donnell and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Richard T Kennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wood-Schultz v. Schultz
as 1:2011cv00975
Plaintiff:
Emily Betty-Dawn Wood-Schultz
Defendant:
Russell John Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brockel v. Brockel et al
as 2:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Richard M Brockel
Defendant:
Lisa M Brockel and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Fenske
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Trevor A Fenske , Tina M Dahle , John Doe and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Trevor A Fenske and Tina M Dahle
Third_party_defendant:
Timothy Mark Brovold , Gray & Associates LLP , Wells Fargo Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hall et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services et al
as 2:2010cv01007
Plaintiff:
John E Hall and Mary Hall
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services , Rhonda Bemore and Robert Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reinke v. Sterling Infosystems Inc
as 2:2010cv00798
Plaintiff:
John D Reinke
Defendant:
Sterling Infosystems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
