Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lucine Trim et al v. John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC
as 2:2020cv02161
Defendant:
JOHN C. HEATH, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC, John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC and John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC a Utah corporation doing business as Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FREY and LUCINE TRIM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Heath v. Checkr, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01373
Defendant:
Checkr, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson-Hendricks v. Heath Benefits Center et al
as 2:2016cv01649
Plaintiff:
Twonesha Johnson-Hendricks
Defendant:
Heath Benefits Center and Steve Dorfman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Cierra Word et al v. Experian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Amjed Ababseh, Kathleen Alcorn, Tim Altman and others
Defendant:
Experian Holdings, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Ramona Hasanzadeh v. John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC et al
as 5:2015cv02617
Defendant:
Does and John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Ramona Hasanzadeh
Hale v. Heath
as 3:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale
Defendant:
John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pierson et al v. Heath
as 1:2015cv00149
Defendant:
John C. Heath
Plaintiff:
Ebony Pierson and Cruz Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clinton, Mel Cohen, Bonnie Condon and others
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. and General Motors, LLC
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Dan Henderson et al
as 5:2011cv00723
Defendant:
Dan Henderson and Heath Sims
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Leatt Corporation et al v. Innovative Safety Technology, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
Leatt Corporation and Exceed Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Defendant:
Innovative Safety Technology, LLC, Kevin Heath Enterprises, Inc., Kevin Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
