Cases 1 - 10 of 132
MILLS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024mc00072
Petitioner:
BRENDA MILLS and FRISELLA BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HEKMATI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv03774
Plaintiff:
AMIR HEKMATI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. VICTIMS OF STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM FUND, KENNETH FEINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
SENTER et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SENTER, THOMAS BROWN, JESSE ANDRE and others
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COZY, INC. v. DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.
as 1:2022mc00112
Petitioner:
COZY, INC. and TRAVIS BROWN
Respondent:
DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv02003
Petitioner:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, CLAIBORNE W. BROWN, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. ULMER
as 1:2021cv03128
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN, III
Defendant:
CRAIG W. ULMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE NON-PARTY SUBPOENA TO THE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY
as 1:2021mc00065
In Re:
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY
Plaintiff:
WYATT B., et al and WYATT B.
Defendant:
KATE BROWN
SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2021cv01760
Defendant:
Acting Administrator TRISTAN BROWN, PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Plaintiff:
SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General of Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
TANNER-BROWN et al v. DE LA VEGA et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
HARVEST INSTITUTE FREEDMEN FEDERATION, LLC and LEATRICE TANNER-BROWN
Defendant:
TARA MACLEAN SWEENEY, SCOTT DE LA VEGA and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
