Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DIDONATO et al v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2017cv04941
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BRUCE DIDONATO , CLARK G. TRAVERS , LEO HOLT and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. MITCHELL and CORR MITCHELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. CLARK
as 2:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
RONALD N. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Clark v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03442
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Clark
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv03442
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Clark
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ESIS, INC. v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv00168
Movant:
ESIS, INC.
Defendant:
CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY and HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORPORATION
Respondent:
CLIFFORD MONCRIEFFE and GLORIA MONCRIEFFE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES- LOCAL 1904 et al v. GATES et al
as 3:2007cv04548
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES- LOCAL 1904, JOHN R. POITRAS, MARIA A. LASALA and others
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, PETER GEREN, DAVID M. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN PROLIFE COALITION et al v. NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00454
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN PROLIFE COALITION and DANIEL F. CLARK
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC., NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, INC., SUSSEX COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
