Cases 1 - 7 of 7
William Joiner v. Channel 5 LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01160
Defendant:
Channel 5 LLC, Kelly S. Johnson, Evan Gilbert-Katz and others
Plaintiff:
William Joiner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Chan et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2023cv10365
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chan, Tamara Hoffman and Does 1 through 200
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
People of the State of California et al v. Eisengrein et al
as 3:2022cv01648
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, San Diego Comprehensive Pain Management Center, Inc. and Pacific Surgical Institute of Pain Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Jaysen Eisengrein, Sandra Love and Does 1 through 200
Hagen et al v. Last Chance Funding, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01559
Plaintiff:
Carrie E. Sorrento, Carrie Hagen, Euromotorwerks, LLC and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Rentto, Esq., Does 1 through 200, Last Chance Funding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richard G. Miro et al v. Aerojet General Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv02593
Defendant:
Aerojet General Corporation, Jay Kim Engineering, Cowden Metal Specialties, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
General Chemical Corporation, d/b/a Genlabs
Plaintiff:
Georgia Espinoza, Jenna Miro, Karen Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dante Valve Company v. Republic Brass Sales, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02582
Defendant:
Does 1 through 200, Hawk Valve, Inc. and Republic Brass Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dante Valve Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alegre et al v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morales, Julian Clay, Jamie Peart and others
Defendant:
Weldon Loudermilk, Javin Moore, Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
