Cases 1 - 10 of 20
DePerro v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior
as 4:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Gary M. DePerro
Defendant:
Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Zupp v. Selene Finance LP
as 4:2021cv02299
Plaintiff:
Gary Zupp
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huff v. Mahajan, M.D. et al
as 1:2020cv02499
Defendant:
Gary D. Cerasi, Creative Business Strategies, Inc., Sangeeta T. Mahajan, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
John Huff, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelley v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Cenlar Agency, Inc., aka Cenlar FSB dba Central Loan Administration and Reporting and Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gary Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Painters Supply & Equipment Co. v. Ellis
as 5:2018cv02070
Defendant:
Gary D Ellis
Plaintiff:
Painters Supply & Equipment Co.
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Booth et al
as 1:2016cv01418
Plaintiff:
Paul Gary Wilson
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Pigg et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Gary Pigg and Barbara Pigg
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pigg et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02433
Plaintiff:
Gary Pigg and Barbara Pigg
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dotson v. Twin Valley Behavioral Healthcare et al
as 2:2014cv01586
Plaintiff:
Natalie M. Dotson
Defendant:
Twin Valley Behavioral Healthcare, Gary Davis, Dr. Browning-Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford v. Revenue Recovery Services
as 1:2014cv01689
Plaintiff:
Gary Crawford
Defendant:
Revenue Recovery Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
