Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jabbar v. Graham et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Jabbar
Defendant:
Kimberly Jolson and Judge James Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jabbor v. Graham
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Jabbor
Defendant:
James Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Graham v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03112
Plaintiff:
Kami Graham
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC and Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham v. World Recovery Service, LLC
as 5:2014cv01064
Plaintiff:
Vickie Graham
Defendant:
World Recovery Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham v. Chase Bank USA N.A.
as 2:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Christen Graham
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00963
Plaintiff:
Otto Graham
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tibbs et al v. Sebelius et al
as 2:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Clark Tibbs and Phagevax Inc
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Nicole Lurie, Nancy J Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 247 Personal Injury-Swine Flu
Brumlow v. Walmart et al
as 2:2008cv00714
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brumlow
Defendant:
Walmart, Mary Brumlow, Sandy Chapplle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Vevie Jennine Graham and Frederick M. Luper
Defendant:
Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC, Kevin L. Williams, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Natl Air Traffic, et al v. Pena, et al
as 1:1994cv00574
Plaintiff:
National Air Traffic Controllers Association, MEBA, AFL-CIO , David Clinkscale and Margaret Graham
Defendant:
Federico Pena and David Hinson
Movant:
Tracy Jenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
