Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Noffsinger v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01447
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Noffsinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McKinley v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01720
Plaintiff:
David McKinley
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stanich v. Quick Collect, Inc.,
as 3:2017cv01693
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Angela Stanich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wolfe v. Kenneth Mitchell-Phillips, Sr. et al
as 3:2016cv02186
Defendant:
Kenneth Mitchell-Phillips, Sr. and Quick Collect, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Micah Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Voloshina v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01398
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nataliya Voloshina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Banner v. Quick Collect Inc.
as 3:2015cv01985
Plaintiff:
Melinda Banner
Defendant:
Quick Collect Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goodall v. Quick Collect, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
Michael Goodall
Defendant:
Kenneth Stephen Mitchell-Phillips, Sr., Mitchell-Phillips Malcolm, PLLC, Jason Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hingston v. Quick Collect, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Jodi Hingston
Defendant:
Kenneth Mitchell-Phillips, Sr. and Quick Collect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Torres v. Paul Puziss, M.D., P.C., et al
as 3:2012cv00027
Defendant:
Paul Puziss, M.D., P.C. and Quick Collect, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Torres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hartly et al v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hartly and Russell Hartly
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
