Cases 1 - 10 of 15
White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv04625
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roger White, Jr.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co LTD
ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv00369
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THOMAS-FREDERICK ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Immunomedics, Inc v. Roger Williams Medical Center et al
as 2:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
IMMUNOMEDICS, INC.
Defendant:
Roger Williams Medical Center, RICHARD P. JUNGHANS, STEVEN C KATZ and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. S HACKETT MARKETING LLC et al
as 3:2017cv04911
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
S HACKETT MARKETING LLC, R THOMAS MARKETING LLC, SHAWN HACKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
JOLLIS v. CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC. et al
as 3:2017cv03579
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOLLIS
Defendant:
CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
ROGERS v. MELLMAN et al
as 1:2016cv01832
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. ROGERS
Defendant:
MARTIN H MELLMAN and GOLD GERSTEIN GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COTTRELL et al v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05859
Plaintiff:
LEONARD COTTRELL , SANDRA HENON , WILLIAM REEVES and others
Defendant:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
ROGERS v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2012cv05655
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE ROGERS
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. US SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
US SERVICES, INC. and ROGER M. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MEDINA v. THE CHALLENGE PRINTING CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05682
Plaintiff:
ROGER MEDINA
Defendant:
THE CHALLENGE PRINTING CO., INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
