Cases 1 - 10 of 37
COUNTY OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv17138
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, BEVERLY SACKLER, H. D. SMITH WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv13684
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GIVAUDAN FLAVORS CORPORATION v. FITZHENRY-RUSSELL et al
as 2:2018cv10961
Plaintiff:
GIVAUDAN FLAVORS CORPORATION
Defendant:
JACKIE FITZHENRY-RUSSELL and GEGHAM MARGARYIAN
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv10842
Plaintiff:
THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD,
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LENNON v. JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv05724
Plaintiff:
OWEN THOMAS LENNON
Defendant:
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP, RUSSEL FELTER, TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE CONSOLIDATED ROCHE RETIREMENT PLAN v. LAVELLE et al
as 2:2017cv11506
Plaintiff:
THE CONSOLIDATED ROCHE RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant:
HELEN LAVELLE, KERI ANN CURRLIN, RYAN W. GEIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
WENZEL et al v. SETERUS INC.
as 3:2017cv03188
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WENZEL and PATRICIA WENZEL
Defendant:
SETERUS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRASSETTO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv06960
Petitioner:
LISA M FRASSETTO and SCOTT FRASSETTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID BURTON and H. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
RUSSELL M. HOLSTEIN, PH.D., LLC v. INCROWD, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv05161
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL M. HOLSTEIN, PH.D., LLC
Defendant:
INCROWD, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
