Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party:
21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Roomster Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07389
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, People of The State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Roomster Corp., John Shriber, Roman Zaks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. First Republic Bank et al
as 1:2011cv09572
Defendant:
Weintraub Capital Management, L.P., Florence S. Bradshaw, Board of Trustees of the Directors Guild of America-Producer Pension Plan, as administrator of the directors guild of America-Producer Pension Plan Basic Benefit Plan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Enhanced RAFI (R) US Large, L.P.(sued herein as Research Affiliates Fundamental Index LP), Cutler Group, LP, Carol E Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust Company, Board of Administration of the Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan, incorrectly named as "Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan-LCV" and "Water, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and others
Interested Party:
Estate of Robert D. Nelson and Joint Board of Trustees of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust, as Administrator of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
United States Of America v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
the State of Indiana, the State of Georgia, the State of New Jersey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and DEF
Intervenor Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Respondent:
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Petitioner:
Patrick A. Klingman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
The City of New York v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2019cv05934
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan - Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
The City of New York and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Lower East Side People's Federal Credit Union v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv09536
Plaintiff:
Lower East Side People's Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Donald John Trump and John Michael Mulvaney
Amicu:
Chris Dodd , Barney Frank , Sherrod Brown and others
Movant:
Susan Block-Lieb , Mark E. Budnitz , Prentiss Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
People of the State of California v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2014cv07787
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America, et al v. Dr. Reddy's Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv03779
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Inc. , Omnicare, Inc. and Neighborcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
The United States of America et al. v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2012cv07382
Plaintiff:
The State of Minnesota , The State of Wisconsin , The State of Illinois and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, ex rel, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2011cv08196
Plaintiff:
United States Of America , State of California , State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Interpleader_plaintiff:
State of Washington
Intervenor_plaintiff:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 False Claims Act - Civil Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
