Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pancholi v. USCIS et al
as 2:2020cv13232
Defendant:
LOREN MILLER, SUSAN DIBBINS, Acting Secretary of Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Yogesh Pancholi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Nasser v. USCIS District Director et al
as 2:2016cv11737
Plaintiff:
Mohamed M Nasser
Defendant:
USCIS District Director, USDHS, Loretta E Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abdulla v. USCIS District Director et al
as 2:2015cv13453
Plaintiff:
Hemood Abdulla Abdulla
Defendant:
USCIS District Director, USCIS Detroit District Director, USDHS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Al Ghaflah v. USCIS et al
as 4:2014cv10275
Plaintiff:
Abbas M. Mohammed Al Ghaflah
Defendant:
USCIS, USCIS Detroit District Director, Eric H Holder, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mezel v. USCIS et al
as 2:2013cv14583
Plaintiff:
Imad Mezel
Defendant:
USCIS , USCIS Detroit District Director , FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mezel v. USCIS Detroit District Director et al
as 2:2013cv14069
Plaintiff:
Imad S Mezel
Defendant:
USCIS Detroit District Director, Robert Mueller, USDHS and others
Almansuri v. USCIS et al
as 2:2011cv11547
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Hayder Almansuri
Defendant:
USCIS , USCIS Detroit District Director , Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
GEGOVIC v. USCIS Detroit District Director et al
as 2:2011cv10236
Defendant:
USCIS Detroit District Director , USDHS , U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Blerta GEGOVIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Laougine v. USCIS et al
as 5:2010cv13537
Plaintiff:
Veniamin Laougine
Defendant:
USCIS, USCIS Detroit District Director, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Liang v. USCIS Detroit District Director et al
as 2:2010cv12380
Plaintiff:
Xuzhang Liang
Defendant:
USCIS Detroit District Director, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
