Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hyland v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2023cv15668
Plaintiff:
Jake Hyland
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv05958
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lumpkins and Unknown
Defendant:
Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Randall Gardner
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brown-Davis et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2019cv05392
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith, Kristie Kolacny, Siobhan E. Fannin and others
Defendant:
The Retirement Plan Committee of the Walgreen Profit-Sharing Retirement Trust, Walgreen Co., Does 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Joshi et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2018cv03626
Plaintiff:
Jay Joshi and National Pain Centers, LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2015cv05723
Plaintiff:
Don Henderson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De La Torre et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2015cv05075
Plaintiff:
Paul De La Torre and Joshua Ogden
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
