Cases 21 - 23 of 23
Trout Unlimited, et al v. Building Industry As, et al
as 07-35623
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TROUT UNLIMITED, AMERICAN RIVERS, PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
D. ROBERT LOHN, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator of National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Regional Office and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON STATE FARM BUREAU, COALITION FOR IDAHO WATER and others
Natl Wildlife Fed, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 06-35011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Defendant-intervenor:
NORTHWEST IRRIGATION UTILITIES, PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL, BPA CUSTOMER GROUP and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Amicu:
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
COLUMBIA -SNAKE RIVER IRRIGATORS ASSOCIATION
Natural Resources De, et al v. Houston, et al
as 2:1988cv01658
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Trout Unlimited Of C , Bay Institute Of San and others
Defendant:
David G. Houston , Donald P. Hodel , Friant Water Users A and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Madera Irrigation , Chowcilla Water District , Orange Cove Irrigation District and others
Amicu:
State Water Resources Control Board of the State of California , Central Delta Water Agency , South Delta Water Agency and others
Intervenor:
Friant Water Users Authority , San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
