Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Ohio Attorney General v. Rosenfeld et al
as 3:2013cv01841
Defendant: Stanley Rosenfeld , 333 Joseph, LLC , Robert Cendol and others
Plaintiff: State of Ohio and Michael DeWine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Gateway Energy & Coke Company, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00616
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Illinois and State of Ohio
Defendant: Gateway Energy & Coke Company, LLC, Haverhill Coke Company, LLC and Suncoke Energy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant: Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant: Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant: Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant: Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff: Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3800
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
Intervenor - Appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO, COALITION TO SAVE OUR WATERWAYS and WENDELLA SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General v. Johnson Welded Products Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff: State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General
Defendant: Johnson Welded Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
State of Ohio v. Cabot Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv01099
Plaintiff: State of Ohio
Defendant: Cabot Corporation , CBS Operations, Inc. , The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States of America et al v. City of Euclid, Ohio
as 1:2011cv01783
Plaintiff: United States of America and State of Ohio
Defendant: City of Euclid, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General v. Otterbein University et al
as 2:2011cv00508
Plaintiff: State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General
Defendant: Otterbein University and United States of America, United States Department of Defense & Robert M. Gates in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
USA v. City of Akron, et al
as 11-3556
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: CITY OF AKRON
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OHIO
United States of America v. Osborne, Sr. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01029
Cross Defendant: Susan Hedman, Richard M. Osborne, Sr., Madison/Route 20, LLC and others
Defendant: J.T.O., Inc. and Naylor Family Partnership
Plaintiff: State of Ohio and United States of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff: City of Willoughby, Ohio
Not Classified By Court: Mr. Mark E. Dottore and Mark E. Dottore
Cross Claimant: Midway Industrial Campus Co., Ltd.
Respondent: Steven A. Calabrese
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?