Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Wildnerness Watch, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al
as 08-1167
Plaintiff:
Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club Northstar Chapter and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant - Appellee:
Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor - Appellee:
Conservationists With Common Sense, Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Grand Portage Band of the Minnesota Tribe
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al
as 07-3696
Plaintiff:
Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club Northstar Chapter and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant:
Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor - Appellant:
Conservationists With Common Sense, Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Grand Portage Band of the Minnesota Tribe
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al
as 07-3689
Plaintiff:
Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club Northstar Chapter and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant - Appellee:
Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor - Appellee:
Conservationists With Common Sense, Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Grand Portage Band of the Minnesota Tribe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.