Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv05296
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy, Wild Salmon Rivers d/b/a The Conservation Angler and Wild Salmon Rivers doing business as The Conservation Angler
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Waste Action Project v. King's Command Foods LLC
as 2:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Waste Action Project
Defendant:
King's Command Foods, LLC and King's Command Foods LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Tan Phu Cuong Investment LLC et al v. King County
as 2:2018cv01102
Plaintiff:
Emiliya Shuparskaya and Tan Phu Cuong Investment LLC
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sno-King Watershed Council et al v. Snohomish County
as 2:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sno-King Watershed Council and Waste Action Project
Defendant:
Snohomish County
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Unites States of America, et al v. King County
as 2:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Unites States of America and State of Washington
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. King County
as 2:2011cv01747
Plaintiff:
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
