Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Center for Biological Diversity v. Berger et al
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity
Respondent:
Keith E. Berger and Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Slope Conservation Center et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2020cv02787
Defendant:
Jamie Connell, David Bernhardt and U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Workshop, The Wilderness Society and Western Slope Conservation Center
Petitioner:
Wilderness Society, The
Respondent:
Jaime E. Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4331
Swensen et al v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv02642
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Swensen and Izabela Bozena Meducka
Defendant:
Loretta E Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hispanic Affairs Project, et al v. Perez, et al
as 1:2015cv01785
Plaintiff:
Hispanic Affairs Project and Rodolfo Llacua
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez , United States Department of Labor and Portia Wu
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Phelps et al v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv01405
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Phelps and Nathalie Phelps
Defendant:
Loretta E Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
v. Reyes et al
as 1:2014cv01085
Defendant:
Ernesto Reyes, Kristina Ryan, Sheree Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reyes et al v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014cv01087
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Reyes , Sheree Perez , Kristina Ryan and others
Defendant:
David (I) Smith, David Smith, John Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc. v. The Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc.
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, The, Keith E. Berger, Greg Shoop and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
