Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Reproductive Health Services, et al v. Daryl Bailey, et al
as 17-13561
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, on behalf of its patients, physicians and staff and JUNE AYERS, RN
Defendant - Appellant:
DARYL D. BAILEY, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Alabama and STEVE T. MARSHALL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Marnika Lewis, et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 17-11009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARNIKA LEWIS, ANTOIN ADAMS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
