Cases 111 - 120 of 242
SEoiL Agency Co, Ltd v. Camden Seafoods International, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01344
Plaintiff:
SEoiL Agency Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Camden Seafoods International, LLC and F/V Tigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Bianco et al
as 2:2016cv01250
Plaintiff:
James T Hill
Defendant:
James A Bianco, Louis A Bianco, Phillip M Nudelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laxfoss et al v. I.C.E. International Capital Equipment Inc
as 2:2016cv00777
Plaintiff:
Kristjan Laxfoss and F/V Lady Gudny
Defendant:
I.C.E. International Capital Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951
Nahar et al v. Bianco et al
as 2:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
Rajesh Nahar and Thirukumaran Velayudhan
Defendant:
James A. Bianco, Louis A. Bianco, Bruce J. Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LFS, Inc. v. Blue et al
as 2:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
LFS Inc
Defendant:
M/V Robin Blue, Zed L Blue and Jane Doe Blue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company v. Ha et al
as 2:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jarred Ha, Joe V. Ha, Dale A. Ha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beck v. Pike et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Beck
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pike and F/V Fishalot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
McClain, III v. 1st Security Bank of Washington et al
as 2:2015cv01945
Plaintiff:
Charles V McClain, III
Defendant:
1st Security Bank of Washington , May-Ling , John Doe Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ING Bank, N.V. v. M/V LIGARI
as 3:2015cv05881
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, N.V.
Defendant:
M/V LIGARI
Claimant:
Star Record Owning Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
KPI Bridge Oil Ltd. v. M/V EVERGLORY
as 3:2015cv05851
Plaintiff:
KPI Bridge Oil Ltd.
Defendant:
M/V EVERGLORY
Claimant:
Marina Amethyst Shipping Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
