Cases 11 - 20 of 28
JAMES et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JAMES, JR. and SHIRLEY V. JAMES
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC , STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY and PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL v. OPM
as 1:2016cv00930
Plaintiff:
SHEILA V. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
OPM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CORE VCT PLC et al v.HENSLEY
as 1:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
CORE VCT PLC , CORE VCT IV PLC and CORE VCT V PLC
Defendant:
JAMES HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADDUCI v. KRANE
as 1:2013cv01104
Plaintiff:
V. JAMES ADDUCI, II
Defendant:
LEONARD W KRANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HILL et al v. WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2011cv02158
Plaintiff:
ADAM HILL , TODD ASHTON HARVILLE , DAVID BOND and others
Defendant:
WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, KELLOG-BROWN & ROOT, LLC and HALLIBURTON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BI SOLUTIONS, LLC et al v. CAMPBELL
as 1:2011cv01657
Plaintiff:
BI SOLUTIONS, LLC , SHARON J. PRATT and KEITH E. TAYLOR
Defendant:
STANLEY V. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
BUCKLEY v. PAPERBOY VENTURES, LLC
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOHN V. BUCKLEY
Defendant:
PAPERBOY VENTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00975
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COST OF WISCONSIN, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
UHAR & COMPANY, INC. v. JACOB et al
as 1:2009cv01698
Plaintiff:
UHAR & COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
MOHAN V. JACOB and MANNA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
