Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, LLP v. Lowe
as 1:2021cv01048
Defendant:
Dan Lowe
Plaintiff:
Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Stein v. Green Dot Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv02230
Defendant:
George T. Shaheen, Chris Brewster, Jeffrey B. Osher and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
WB Studio Enterprises Inc. v. Dan Schwartz CPA PC
as 7:2020cv01654
Plaintiff:
WB STUDIO ENTERPRISES INC.
Defendant:
DAN SCHWARTZ CPA PC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203
American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. d/b/a ABC Supply Co. v. Dan C. Fulmer, Inc.
as 6:2020cv06099
Plaintiff:
American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. d/b/a ABC Supply Co.
Defendant:
Dan C. Fulmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Perles et al v. Drennan et al
as 1:2019cv10690
Plaintiff:
Perles Law Firm, P.C., Steven R. Perles and Fay and Perles FSIA Litigation Partnership
Defendant:
Dan Gaskill, Patrick Donahue, Joseph Peter Drennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dan-Bunkering (America), Inc. et al v. Kamca Trading S.A.
as 1:2019cv04856
Defendant:
Kamca Trading S.A.
Plaintiff:
Dan-Bunkering (America), Inc. and A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc
Hale et al v. State Farm Insurance et al
as 5:2019cv00509
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance, Rick Franciso and Dan Tivnan
Plaintiff:
Maureen Hale and David Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Burkhardt v. Razer Inc.
as 1:2019cv03352
Plaintiff:
Dan Burkhardt
Defendant:
Razer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Long Player L.P. v. Gold Maiden L.L.C. et al
as 1:2018cv02414
Plaintiff:
Long Player L.P.
Defendant:
Gold Maiden L.L.C. , United Tristar L.L.C. , Jeremy Soussan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
