Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Rich et al v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02294
Plaintiff:
Jared Rich and Kurtis Friesen
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse , Robert R. Bennett , Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartleib v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02266
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hartleib
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse, Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pagano v. Bennett et al
as 2:2012cv02242
Plaintiff:
Terri Pagano
Defendant:
Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune, Larry C. Glasscock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Forsee et al
as 2:2010cv02445
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Randolph
Defendant:
Gary D. Forsee , Paul N. Saleh , James H. Hance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Privatebank and Trust Company, The v. Bell, Sr. et al
as 2:2009cv02584
Plaintiff:
Privatebank and Trust Company, The
Defendant:
Donald H. Bell, Sr., Faith N. Bell, H. Frank Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Turney, Jr. et al v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 2:2009cv02533
Plaintiff:
Frank Turney, Jr., Frank Turney, Jr., Turney & Son, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Dz Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Near v. Crivello et al
as 2:2009cv02233
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Near and Phillip L. Near
Defendant:
Frank Crivello, Titan Global Holdings, Inc., David Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Monopoly Acquisitions, et al v. T.E.N. Investments, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02161
Plaintiff:
Monopoly Acquisitions,, Odessa Ford, LLC and Odessa Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC
Defendant:
T.E.N. Investments, Inc, T.E.N. Investments, Inc, T.E.N. Investments, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
