Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Haws v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2017cv00891
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Joey Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Crenshaw v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Bill Crenshaw
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management System and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Minson v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 3:2017cv00899
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Cindy Minson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Chauvin et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 3:2017cv00675
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Jane Chauvin and Ronnie F Chauvin
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Arnold v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 3:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Collins et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 2:2013cv05607
Plaintiff:
Larry Collins and Vanessa Collins
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Ducote v. Federal Emergency Management Agency, et al
as 2:2008cv03489
Plaintiff:
Wayne C Ducote and Wayne C Ducote
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
