Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Honore v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jacques Honore
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bourgeois et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Greg Paul Bourgeois and Kelly Ledoux Bourgeois
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Neighbors Federal Credit Union, Hollingsworth Richards Ford DBA River City Ford, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Naquin v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2018cv00080
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ladd D Naquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bowlin v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv01702
Plaintiff:
Cody Matthew Bowlin and Cody Bowlin
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Futch, Sr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Futch, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Futch, Sr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv00203
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Futch, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Futch, Sr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Futch, Sr. and James Futch, Sr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Not Classified By Court:
Drew Nordgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bridges v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv02742
Plaintiff:
Bridges and Nicole Bridges
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Tardo v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv02102
Plaintiff:
Tardo and Kristian Michael Tardo
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ryon, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2016cv15845
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ryon, Christopher Ryon and Chris Lawn Care Service, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
