Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Navarro et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 3:2016cv00323
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Olivia Navarro and Rogelio Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tamez v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Tamez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Rafael Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Salcedo et al v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
as 2:2016cv00108
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Plaintiff:
Joanna Navarro and Juan Salcedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ponce v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2016cv00219
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Rafael Navarro
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro et al v. American Matar International Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01147
Plaintiff:
Arthur I Navarro and Nancy T Navarro
Defendant:
American Matar International Inc, Preferred Contractors Insurance Company RRG and Golden State Claims Adjusters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rangel v. State Farm Lloyds, et al
as 7:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Maria Rangel
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Rafael Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 7:2014cv00489
Plaintiff:
Maricela Navarro
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2014cv00372
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Navarro
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Navarro Pecan Company Inc v. Camilla Pecan Company
as 3:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Navarro Pecan Company Inc
Defendant:
Camilla Pecan Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
City of Corsicana et al v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2012cv04792
Plaintiff:
City of Corsicana , Navarro County and Navarro College
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
