Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Guo v. Mahaffy et al
as 1:2017cv00706
Plaintiff:
Wenduo Guo
Defendant:
Patrick J. Mahaffy, Daniel W. Muehl, Gillian C. Ivers-Read and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gustafson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gustafson and Andrew (I) Gustafson
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RCHFU, LLC et al v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01301
Defendant:
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation and Cobalt Travel Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
RCHFU, LLC, Carl Eichstaedt, III, Carla P Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Macdonald et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Macdonald and Sandra Lynne Ray-Shoemaker
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1957
Beckley v. Skarupa
as 1:2015cv00766
Plaintiff:
Katherine Beckley
Defendant:
Andrew A. Skarupa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elizalde et al v. Sennett et al
as 1:2014cv01516
Plaintiff:
Dario Elizalde and Olga Elizalde
Defendant:
John F. Sennett and Andrew Sennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rocky Vista University, LLC v. Usera
as 1:2013cv02784
Plaintiff:
Rocky Vista University, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Usera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bovino et al v. MacMillan
as 1:2013cv01143
Plaintiff:
David A. Bovino P.C. and David A. Bovino
Defendant:
Andrew McMillan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Swanson v. Weil et al
as 1:2011cv02142
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Swanson
Defendant:
Richard M. Weil, Steven L. Scheid, Timothy Armour and others
Interested_party:
Mitchell Pinsly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pinsly v. Scheid et al
as 1:2011cv01732
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Pinsly
Defendant:
Steven L. Scheid , Richard M. Weil , Timothy K. Armour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
