Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Attorney Recovery Systems, Inc. v. Spectracal, Inc.
as 5:2014cv05570
Defendant:
Spectracal, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Attorney Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas W. McNamara v. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc.
as 2:2013cv09274
Defendant:
Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. McNamara
Williams v. Huha et al
as 1:2012cv01888
Plaintiff:
Lana K Williams
Defendant:
Rex Lee Huha, Old Republic Insurance Company, USF Reddaway Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
BCG Attorney Search Inc v. Carey Bertolet et al
as 2:2012cv09870
Plaintiff:
BCG Attorney Search Inc
Defendant:
Carey Bertolet, Greythorn Inc, Danice Kowalcyzk and others
The Association of Los Angeles City Attorneys v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2012cv04235
Plaintiff:
Association of Los Angeles City Attorneys
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Clyde Veltmann et al v. Heiting and Irwing Attorneys At Law et al
as 2:2012cv04187
Defendant:
Jeffrey Boyd, Jim Heiting, Heiting and Irwing Attorneys At Law and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Veltmann and Diantha Veltmann
Ozaki v. Ellison et al
as 3:2011cv04493
Plaintiff:
Scott Ozaki, Lisa Galaviz and Philip T. Prince
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Ellison, Safra A. Catz, Jeffrey O. Henley and others
Interested Party:
Attorney Jerry K. Cimmet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ducharme v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law PLLC et al
as 3:2010cv02763
Plaintiff:
Mary Ducharme
Defendant:
John C. Heath Attorney at Law PLLC and Adam C. Fullman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watts v. East Palo Alto City Attorney et al
as 5:2009cv03241
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts
Defendant:
East Palo Alto City Attorney and East Palo Alto Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.