Cases 31 - 39 of 39
RAFTER v. STEVENSON
as 2:2009cv00579
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAFTER
Defendant:
WILLIAM STEVENSON
Counter_claimant:
WILLIAM STEVENSON
Counter_defendant:
JOHN RAFTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK v. JAY KEEL F/V et al
as 2:2009cv00310
Plaintiff:
CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
JAY KEEL F/V and JOHN E COTTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SANFORD et al v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE SELF EMPLOYED INC et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SANFORD and JOHN LOCKE
Defendant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE SELF EMPLOYED INC and NASE MEMBER SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BERRY v. WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES INC
as 1:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS BERRY
Defendant:
WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BALDWIN v. BADER et al
as 2:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G BALDWIN
Defendant:
JOHN W BADER , STEVEN P BOULET , MICHAEL L BROUSSEAU and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DE GAETANO v. LAPINSKI et al
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DE GAETANO
Defendant:
JOHN J LAPINSKI and LINDA S LAPINSKI
Trustee:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BERRY v. COSTA et al
as 1:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS BERRY
Defendant:
LARRY COSTA and WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRANK MARTIN SONS INC v. JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARTIN SONS INC
Defendant:
JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
FRANK MARTIN SONS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BALDWIN v. BADER et al
as 2:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G BALDWIN
Defendant:
JOHN W BADER , STEVEN P BOULET , MICHAEL A BROSSEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
