Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P. v. Bouchard Coastwise Management Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv05687
Plaintiff:
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P.
Defendant:
Bouchard Coastwise Management Corporation and Bouchard Transportation Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv03456
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Rodriguez, Sheryl Rodriguez, Sheryl Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodriguez et al v. J.F. Day & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv03413
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Rodriguez and Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
J.F. Day & Company, Inc. and Pella Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Clark-No, Inc. et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2007cv02762
Plaintiff:
Clark-No, Inc., Clark-No, Inc., Ronald L. Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodriguez et al v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv01856
Plaintiff:
Marina Rodriguez, Marina Rodriguez, Raoul Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Sarma, S.A. et al
as 2:2007cv01086
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A. and others
Cross Claimant:
Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A. and others
Cross Defendant:
Maria De Jesus Rios De Jaen and Silvia Elena Rodriguez Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
