Cases 41 - 50 of 55
BANNER HEALTH v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
BANNER HEALTH
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
GLENDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER et al v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
GLENDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SENTARA NORFOLK GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
SENTARA NORFOLK GENERAL HOSPITAL and SENTARA HAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
COUNCIL FOR UROLOGICAL INTERESTS v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL FOR UROLOGICAL INTERESTS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PROVIDENCE ST. PETER HOSPITAL v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE ST. PETER HOSPITAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. and EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. and EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HOPE CARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
HOPE CARE, INC. and HOPE CARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
