Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Roy Jones et al v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv06605
Plaintiff:
ROY JONES and Alyce Rubinfeld
Defendant:
PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. v. PK WELDING LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02804
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Defendant:
PK WELDING LLC, UNITED COOLING AND REFRIGERATION, INC., AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES LANG LASALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. GREEN CHEF CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv02350
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
GREEN CHEF CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EAGLE MECHANICAL v. JONES LANG LASALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2016cv01124
Plaintiff:
EAGLE MECHANICAL, INC.
Defendant:
JONES LANG LASALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2015cv07201
Plaintiff:
DAWN JONES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
JONES v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv03848
Plaintiff:
YESENIA JONES
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. JOHNSON
as 2:2014cv07427
Plaintiff:
CRAIG JONES
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
SYNDICUS, INC. v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2014cv06199
Plaintiff:
SYNDICUS, INC.
Defendant:
VICTOR THOMAS, AWD MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and DANIELLE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
JONES v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
