Cases 41 - 48 of 48
ACOSTA et al v. TRAVELERS AUTO INSURANCE CO. OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv06455
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO ACOSTA and MILAGROS ACOSTA
Defendant:
TRAVELERS AUTO INSURANCE CO. OF NEW JERSEY, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and JOHN DOE I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VESPER v. SCORPION RACING ENGINES, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv06379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VESPER
Defendant:
SCORPION RACING ENGINES, LLC , SCORPION RACING ENGINES , PHIL HARPER MOTORSPORTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIOVENE v. BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY CO. et al
as 1:2010cv04576
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. GIOVENE
Defendant:
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY CO. and JOHN DOES I-III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
MEAT PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. BELLVILLE RODAIR INTERNATIONAL et al
as 2:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
MEAT PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
BELLVILLE RODAIR INTERNATIONAL, HAPAG-LLOYD AMERICA, INC., HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARINARI et al
as 3:2007cv02473
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DONALD J. MARINARI and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
REED v. LIBERTY TAX SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01804
Plaintiff:
JEROME REED
Defendant:
LIBERTY TAX SERVICE, INC., JOHN DOES I-V and XYZ CORP. 1-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE v. LEE et al
as 2:2007cv01763
Plaintiff:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. LEE and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
