Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. et al v. PJ Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03138
Plaintiff:
Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
PJ Enterprises, LLC and Peter Farley
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kim et al
as 1:2012cv02539
Defendant:
Peter M. Chi , Kim Moore, Mikyung K. Lyu and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC v. Palermo
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Defendant:
Peter Palermo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 1:2012cv01406
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Wilson
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KBS, Inc. v. Hospitality Furnishing, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
KBS, Inc.
Defendant:
Hospitality Furnishing, Inc., Furniture Direct, LLC, Peter Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MidFirst Bank v. Tu et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
Peter Tu and Mei Ching Liu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1464
Hopson v. Nelson
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Peter David Hopson
Defendant:
Joe Nelson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Rosen
as 1:2011cv03309
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Peter S. Rosen
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Wells Fargo Bank, National, Association v. Aaron et al
as 1:2011cv03305
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Peter L. Aaron, Kim R. Aaron, Howard P. Alpern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Kase et al
as 1:2011cv02623
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Matthew Kase , Kimberly Kase , Peter Damian Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
