Cases 41 - 50 of 246
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. CAMPUS, INC.
as 2:2017cv11564
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
CAMPUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. HUDSON HOSPITALITY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07941
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
HUDSON HOSPITALITY HOLDINGS, LLC and MADELINE PENACHIO-KONIGSBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. D & M INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05867
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
D & M INVESTMENTS, INC., ALAN B. MOLLOHAN, BARBARA MOLLOHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC v. CENTURY-OMAHA HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04302
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC
Defendant:
CENTURY-OMAHA HOSPITALITY, LLC, DON WIESELER and JEANNE WIESELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. UTSAV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03047
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
UTSAV, LLC, SUBBARAO YALLAPRAGADA and SHEELA YALLAPRAGADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. CHOA DAYTON, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08099
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
CHOA DAYTON, LLC, ORTAL REAL ESTATE & MANAGEMENT, INC. and DAN TEPPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. KIM
as 2:2016cv05290
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
MIN JUNG KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. MORRIS HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04834
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
MORRIS HOSPITALITY, LLC and JIM MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. SURAJHIRA LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04690
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
SURAJHIRA LLC and DARSHIL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. SHADELAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04492
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
SHADELAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, SHAHID HUSSAIN, SOHAIL KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
