Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2007cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
United States of America et al v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 4:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Hobson Fabricating Corp.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
United States of America et al v. Robec-Navajo Construction, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Patrick Construction Inc.
Defendant:
Robec-Navajo Construction, LLC, Ro-Bec Construction, LLC, Ro-Bec Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:1990cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garnishee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
United States of America v. Shick
as 1:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chad Shick and First State Bank of Forsyth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Great Falls Sand and Gravel v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 4:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Great Falls Sand and Gravel
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Joseph J. Henderson and Robec Navajo Construction
Cross Claimant:
Joseph J. Henderson
Cross Defendant:
United States of America and Great Falls Sand and Gravel
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
