Cases 61 - 70 of 20,843
Anderson et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Leana Anderson and Brian Anderson
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Leobbaka v. ESS Tech Inc
as 3:2024cv03610
Plaintiff:
Jeff Leobbaka
Defendant:
ESS Tech Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cavaliere v. Tesla, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03621
Plaintiff:
Andrea Cavaliere
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mercado et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03580
Plaintiff:
Isaias Elias Mercado and Yolanda Elias Renovato
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Cherotti v. expHand, Inc. et al
as 4:2024mc80147
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cherotti
Defendant:
expHand, Inc. and Frank Nemirofsky
Cherotti v. expHand, Inc. et al
as 4:2024mc80148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cherotti
Defendant:
expHand, Inc. and Frank Nemirofsky
Samirian Chemicals, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC
as 4:2024cv03575
Plaintiff:
Samirian Chemicals, Inc.
Defendant:
Cardinal Health 200, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Artur Muradyan v. Bentley Motors, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Artur Muradyan
Defendant:
Bentley Motors, Inc., Rusnak Pasadena and Does 1 through 30, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Bank of Hope v. Expedited Travel, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Bank of Hope
Defendant:
Expedited Travel, LLC, Matthew Allen Borisch, Tommys Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ryan v. X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
as 3:2024cv03547
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan
Defendant:
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
