Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Ameris Bank v. Mountainside Coal Company
as 8:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
MOUNTAINSIDE COAL COMPANY, INC., a Tennessee corporation and Mountainside Coal Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Commercial Door and Specialties Inc et al
as 8:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-charted banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Commercial Door and Specialties Inc, Samuel Giardino and Sandra Giardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Blaze Trucking LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Blaze Trucking LLC and Gregory Blaise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Thru Tubing Downhole Solution Corp. et al
as 8:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Thru Tubing Downhole Solution Corp, and Jason Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. American Transportation System, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
American Transportation System, Inc. and Senad Mujcinovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. ESCP Corp.
as 8:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
ESCP Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Charles Kirkland Companies LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Charles Kirkland Companies LLC and Charles Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Pines Road Quick Stop LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank, a Georgia state charted banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Pines Road Quick Stop LLC, Hussein Alawna, Sharif Darkhalil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Artur Logistics Corp. et al
as 8:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia corporation dba Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Artur Logistics Corp, a Pennsylvania corporation, Azamat Zhumaliev, an individual, Artur Logistics Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. My Carpet Broker, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia corporation dba Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
My Carpet Broker, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Joshua Michael McMurtrey, an individual, My Carpet Broker, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
