Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WU & ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WU & ASSOCIATES INC and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
BA HOFT AND ASSOCIATES INC v. DTC ENGINEERSAND CONSTRUCTORS LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
BA HOFT AND ASSOCIATES INC
Defendant:
SAILESH ATLURU, LEELA ATLURU, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. WASHBURN AND DOUGHTY ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 2:2010cv00402
Plaintiff:
ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WASHBURN AND DOUGHTY ASSOCIATES INC and DOUGHTY AND WASHBURN LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAIETTA ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 2:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MAIETTA ENTERPRISES INC, MAIETTA FOUNDATION INC, LOUIS E MAIETTA, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERLICH v. OUELLETTE LABONTE ROBERGE AND ALLEN PA
as 2:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
MARK ERLICH
Defendant:
OUELLETTE LABONTE ROBERGE AND ALLEN PA
Consol_defendant:
S R THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES INC
Consol_counter_claimant:
S R THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES INC
Consol_counter_defendant:
MARK ERLICH
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ERLICH v. S R THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES INC
as 2:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
MARK ERLICH
Defendant:
S R THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES INC
Counter_claimant:
S R THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES INC
Counter_defendant:
MARK ERLICH
Cause Of Action: Diversity
QUANTUM HOSPITALITY GROUP INC et al v. WILLIAM OATES AND ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
QUANTUM HOSPITALITY GROUP INC , HOWARD J LEVITAN and REBECCA A LEVITAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM OATES AND ASSOCIATES INC, WILLIAM A OATES and HEIDE JK BREDFELDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
